When trying to use a tuple instead of the anonymous type, the code doesn't compile because the expression trees API wasn't expanded with support for tuples when these were added to the language. There aren't any nodes which would describe the tuples and operations involving them. That's unfortunate because tuples have a useful advantage over anonymous types - they can be a part of a method signature.
Without tuples one would need to create a custom class with the required properties if that type needed to be returned from a method:. With tuples, that's not necessary anymore. A method can return a tuple. In this case, you don't have a compile-time T generic placeholder, so you'll use the xref:System. Constructing expression trees using factory methods is relatively complex; it is easier to compose strings.
Queryable, and which accept strings in a special syntax instead of expression trees. The library generates the appropriate expression tree from the string, and can return the resultant translated xref:System. Skip to content. Star 3k. Permalink main.
Branches Tags. Could not load branches. Could not load tags. Raw Blame. That way, Roslyn and the language spec would only specify what the translation is i. Unannotated assemblies would be treated as they are now, with the "1.
The compiler could also generate a message such as The '.. Beta Was this translation helpful? Give Feedback. Skip to content. Star 7.
Return to top. Expression tree evolution Proposed Prototype: ExpressionBuilder support prototype Implementation: Not Started Specification: Not Started Summary This proposal provides a way to introduce changes to the expression trees generated by the compiler, while providing a reasonable backwards compatibility story for legacy LINQ providers and other consumers. Motivation The expression trees haven't had significant updates since introduction and lack many C features that have now become commonplace.
Related discussions: , , In addition to the above there are proposed LINQ features that would also benefit from the proposed pattern: while do Pattern matching Value tuples Detailed design ExpressionTreeLangVersion ExpressionTreeLangVersion is a compiler parameter and csproj option that determines which static methods on Expression are allowed to be called to create the expression tree.
Assembly AttributeTargets. Class AttributeTargets. Oldest Newest Top. Add parameterExpression , Expression. Collaborator Author. Compiler support allows to generate better error messages: Range operators are not supported in expression trees V1. Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment. Insert Link. Link Text. An error occurred while translating this comment.
It cannot parse statement lambdas or multi-line lambdas. For more information about lambda expressions in C , see Lambda Expressions. To create expression trees by using the API, use the Expression class. This class contains static factory methods that create expression tree nodes of specific types, for example, ParameterExpression , which represents a variable or parameter, or MethodCallExpression , which represents a method call.
ParameterExpression , MethodCallExpression , and the other expression-specific types are also defined in the System. These types derive from the abstract type Expression.
NET Framework 4 or later, the expression trees API also supports assignments and control flow expressions such as loops, conditional blocks, and try-catch blocks. By using the API, you can create expression trees that are more complex than those that can be created from lambda expressions by the C compiler.
0コメント